{"id":1621,"date":"2025-03-25T16:33:11","date_gmt":"2025-03-25T16:33:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cennet.trinitywebhosting.com\/?p=1621"},"modified":"2025-03-25T16:33:11","modified_gmt":"2025-03-25T16:33:11","slug":"richard-dawkinsin-yanilgisi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cennet.trinitywebhosting.com\/?p=1621","title":{"rendered":"Richard Dawkins&#8217;in Yan\u0131lg\u0131s\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"margin-top: 5px; margin-bottom: 5px; margin-left: 15px; float: right;\" alt=\"01 image10320 worry people face 45\" src=\"images\/07_GodScie\/06_CrgDelu\/01_image10320%20worry%20people%20face%2045.jpg\" width=\"315\" height=\"216\" \/>Richard Dawkins Yeni Ateizm diye tan\u0131nan hareketin yaramaz \u00e7ocu\u011fu olarak ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131. \u00c7ok satanlar aras\u0131na giren <i>Tanr\u0131 Yan\u0131lg\u0131s\u0131 <\/i>adl\u0131 kitab\u0131 bu hareketin ba\u015fyap\u0131t\u0131 haline geldi. Dawkins bu kitapta Tanr\u0131\u2019ya inanc\u0131n bir yan\u0131lg\u0131, yani \u201cyanl\u0131\u015f bir inan\u00e7 ya da izlenim\u201d veya daha k\u00f6t\u00fcs\u00fc, \u201cg\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc kar\u015f\u0131 kan\u0131tlara ra\u011fmen \u0131srarc\u0131 bir yanl\u0131\u015f inan\u00e7\u201d (1) oldu\u011funu g\u00f6stermeyi ama\u00e7l\u0131yor. Dawkins kitab\u0131n\u0131n 157-158. sayfalar\u0131nda \u201ckitab\u0131m\u0131n ana sav\u0131\u201d dedi\u011fi \u015feyi \u00f6zetliyor. Bunu iyice not edin. Bu arg\u00fcman \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcl\u00fcrse, Dawkins\u2019in kitab\u0131 \u00f6z\u00fcnde bo\u015f demektir. Nitekim, arg\u00fcman\u0131 utand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 olacak kadar zay\u0131ft\u0131r. Sav\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yle:<\/p>\n<p>1. \u0130nsan akl\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 en b\u00fcy\u00fck meydan okumalardan biri, evrendeki karma\u015f\u0131k, olas\u0131l\u0131k d\u0131\u015f\u0131 tasar\u0131m g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn nas\u0131l olu\u015ftu\u011funu a\u00e7\u0131klamak olmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p>2. Do\u011fal denenme, tasar\u0131m g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fc as\u0131l olarak tasar\u0131m\u0131n kendisine atfetmek olmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p>3. Denenme sahtedir \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc tasar\u0131mc\u0131 hipotezi, hemen, tasar\u0131mc\u0131y\u0131 kimin tasarlad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin daha b\u00fcy\u00fck sorunu kendisiyle birlikte getirir.<\/p>\n<p>4. En ustaca yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve kuvvetli a\u00e7\u0131klama do\u011fal se\u00e7im yoluyla Darwinci evrimdir.<\/p>\n<p>5. Fizik i\u00e7in buna e\u015fde\u011fer say\u0131labilecek bir a\u00e7\u0131klamam\u0131z yok.<\/p>\n<p>6. Fizikte de, biyolojide Darwincili\u011fin oldu\u011fu kadar kuvvetli, daha iyi bir a\u00e7\u0131klaman\u0131n olaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin umudu yitirmemeliyiz.<\/p>\n<p>Bu nedenle, Tanr\u0131, neredeyse hemen hemen kesin olarak yoktur.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"margin-top: 5px; margin-right: 15px; margin-bottom: 5px; float: left;\" alt=\"02 image5665 surprise 45\" src=\"images\/07_GodScie\/06_CrgDelu\/02_image5665%20surprise%2045.jpg\" width=\"315\" height=\"216\" \/>Ateistlerin \u201cbu nedenle Tanr\u0131 neredeyse kesin olarak yoktur\u201d sonucu neredeyse hi\u00e7 yoktan ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in, bu arg\u00fcman rahats\u0131z edicidir. Bu sonucun, \u00f6ncesinde s\u0131ralanan alt\u0131 ifadeden do\u011fal olarak \u00e7\u0131kmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 anlamak i\u00e7in felsefeci olman\u0131z gerekmez.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Nitekim, \u015fayet \u00f6nceki alt\u0131 ifadeyi, \u201cbu nedenle, Tanr\u0131 neredeyse kesin olarak yoktur\u201d sonucunu ima eden bir arg\u00fcman\u0131n \u00f6nko\u015fulu olarak kabul edersek, o zaman, arg\u00fcman tescilli olarak ge\u00e7ersizdir. Hi\u00e7bir mant\u0131kl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131m kural\u0131, alt\u0131 \u00f6nko\u015fuldan bu sonucu \u00e7\u0131karman\u0131za izin vermez.<\/p>\n<p>Daha iyimser bir yorum, bu alt\u0131 ifadeyi \u00f6nko\u015ful olarak de\u011fil, Dawkins\u2019in Tanr\u0131\u2019n\u0131n var olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin birikimli arg\u00fcman\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zel a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 olarak ele almak olacakt\u0131r. Ne var ki, bu iyimser yoruma g\u00f6re bile, \u201cbu nedenle Tanr\u0131 yoktur\u201d sonucu, her birinin ger\u00e7ek ve hakl\u0131 oldu\u011funu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnsek bile, bu alt\u0131 ad\u0131mdan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lamaz. Burada g\u00f6sterilen tek yan\u0131lg\u0131, Dawkins\u2019in \u201cTanr\u0131\u2019n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7ok ciddi bir arg\u00fcman\u0131\u201d oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin inanc\u0131d\u0131r. (2)<\/p>\n<p>O halde, Dawkins\u2019in alt\u0131 ad\u0131ml\u0131 arg\u00fcman\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kan nedir? En fazla, Tanr\u0131\u2019n\u0131n var oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131m\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n, evrenin bir tasar\u0131m g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fcne sahip oldu\u011fu temeline dayanmamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fidir. Fakat bu sonu\u00e7, Tanr\u0131\u2019n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131yla ve hatta Tanr\u0131\u2019n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na hakl\u0131 olarak inanmam\u0131zla uyumludur. Belki de, Tanr\u0131\u2019n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na, kozmolojik arg\u00fcman veya ontolojik arg\u00fcman\u0131 temel alarak inanmal\u0131y\u0131z. Belki de, Tanr\u0131\u2019ya inanc\u0131m\u0131z hi\u00e7bir \u015fekilde arg\u00fcmanlara de\u011fil, dinsel deneyimler veya ilahi vahiye dayanmaktad\u0131r. Belki de Tanr\u0131 sadece ona imanla inanmam\u0131z\u0131 ister. S\u00f6ylemek istedi\u011fimiz \u015fu, Tanr\u0131\u2019n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in tasar\u0131m arg\u00fcmanlar\u0131n\u0131 reddetmek, Tanr\u0131\u2019n\u0131n var olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve hatta Tanr\u0131\u2019ya inanc\u0131n haks\u0131z oldu\u011funu kan\u0131tlama konusunda hi\u00e7bir \u015feyi ba\u015farm\u0131yor. Nitekim, bir\u00e7ok H\u0131ristiyan ilahiyat\u00e7\u0131, ateizme teslim olmadan Tanr\u0131\u2019n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin arg\u00fcmanlar\u0131 reddetmi\u015flerdir.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"margin-top: 5px; margin-bottom: 5px; margin-left: 15px; float: right;\" alt=\"03 image12149 arrowhead 45\" src=\"images\/07_GodScie\/06_CrgDelu\/03_image12149%20arrowhead%2045.jpg\" width=\"216\" height=\"315\" \/>Dawkins\u2019in ateizm i\u00e7in arg\u00fcman\u0131, s\u0131rf tart\u0131\u015fma i\u00e7in bile olsa arg\u00fcmanlar\u0131n\u0131 kabul edecek olsak, b\u00fct\u00fcn ad\u0131mlar\u0131nda ba\u015far\u0131s\u0131z oluyor. Fakat, bu ad\u0131mlar\u0131n birka\u00e7 tanesi, her durumda akla uygunluk a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan yanl\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u00d6rne\u011fin, \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ad\u0131m\u0131 ele al\u0131n. Burada Dawkins\u2019in iddias\u0131, evrende karma\u015f\u0131k bir d\u00fczenin olmas\u0131n\u0131n en iyi a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 olarak tasar\u0131m \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n hakl\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc bunun yeni bir sorunu ortaya \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde: O halde tasar\u0131c\u0131y\u0131 kim tasarlad\u0131?<\/p>\n<p>Bu itiraz en az\u0131ndan iki nedenle kusurludur.<\/p>\n<p>Birincisi, bir a\u00e7\u0131klaman\u0131n en iyi a\u00e7\u0131klama olarak kabul edilmesi i\u00e7in a\u00e7\u0131klaman\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131n olmas\u0131 gerekmez. Bilim felsefesinde uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 bi\u00e7imiyle en iyi a\u00e7\u0131klama \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131m\u0131yla ilgili en temel ilkelerden biridir bu. Topra\u011f\u0131 kazan arkeologlar, ok ucu ve keski ba\u015f\u0131 ve seramik par\u00e7alar\u0131 gibi \u015feyler bulacak olsalar, bu kal\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131n, sadece sedimentasyon ve metamorfoz sonucunda ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, kim olduklar\u0131n\u0131 veya nereden geldiklerini bilmeseler de, bilinmeyen bir insan grubunun \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc oldu\u011fu \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131m\u0131nda bulunmakta hakl\u0131 olurlard\u0131. Benzer \u015fekilde, astronotlar, ay\u0131n arka taraf\u0131nda bir y\u0131\u011f\u0131n makinayla kar\u015f\u0131la\u015facak olsalar, bunlar\u0131n ak\u0131ll\u0131 olan ve d\u00fcnyan\u0131n \u00f6tesinde ya\u015fan varl\u0131klar\u0131n i\u015fi oldu\u011funu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnmekte hakl\u0131 olurlard\u0131- d\u00fcnyal\u0131 olmayan bu varl\u0131klar\u0131n kim olduklar\u0131 veya buraya nas\u0131l geldikleri hakk\u0131nda hi\u00e7bir fikirleri olmasa bile bu a\u00e7\u0131klamay\u0131 rahatl\u0131kla yapabilirlerdi.<\/p>\n<p>Bir a\u00e7\u0131klamay\u0131 en iyi a\u00e7\u0131klama olarak tan\u0131mak i\u00e7in a\u00e7\u0131klamay\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klayabilmek gerekmez. Nitekim, b\u00f6ylesi bir ko\u015ful, a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131n kesin olarak durmas\u0131na yol a\u00e7ard\u0131 ki, art\u0131k hi\u00e7bir \u015fey a\u00e7\u0131klanamazd\u0131 ve bilim yok olurdu. Ele almakta oldu\u011fumuz vakada, ak\u0131ll\u0131 tasar\u0131m\u0131n, evrendeki tasar\u0131m g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn en iyi a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 oldu\u011funu kabul etmek i\u00e7in tasar\u0131mc\u0131n\u0131n kim oldu\u011funu a\u00e7\u0131klamak gerekmez.<\/p>\n<hr class=\"system-pagebreak\" \/>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"margin-top: 5px; margin-bottom: 5px; margin-left: 15px; float: right;\" alt=\"04 image9829 god light 45\" src=\"images\/07_GodScie\/06_CrgDelu\/04_image9829%20god%20light%2045.jpg\" width=\"315\" height=\"216\" \/>\u0130kincisi, Dawkins, evrenin ilahi tasar\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 olmas\u0131 durumunda, tasar\u0131mc\u0131n\u0131n, a\u00e7\u0131klanacak \u015fey kadar karma\u015f\u0131k oldu\u011funu ve bu nedenle a\u00e7\u0131klama konusunda bir ilerleme kaydedilmedi\u011fini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnmektedir. Bu itiraz, birbirine rakip a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmede basitli\u011fin oynad\u0131\u011f\u0131 rol hakk\u0131nda bir\u00e7ok soru ortaya \u00e7\u0131karmaktad\u0131r- \u00f6rne\u011fin, a\u00e7\u0131klama kuvveti, a\u00e7\u0131klama kapsam\u0131, makul olma, vs. gibi kriterlerle k\u0131yaslanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Daha az basit bir hipotez, a\u00e7\u0131klama kapsam\u0131 ve kuvveti a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan rakiplerini a\u015farsa, o zaman, basitli\u011fin feda edilmesine kar\u015f\u0131n tercih edilen a\u00e7\u0131klama olabilir.<\/p>\n<p>Fakat bu sorular\u0131 bir kenara b\u0131rakal\u0131m. Dawkins\u2019in temel hatas\u0131, ilahi tasar\u0131mc\u0131n\u0131n, karma\u015f\u0131kl\u0131k a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan evrene benzer bir varl\u0131k oldu\u011fu varsay\u0131m\u0131nda yatmaktad\u0131r. Tanr\u0131, bedensiz bir varl\u0131k olarak dikkat \u00e7ekici bir \u015fekilde basit bir varl\u0131kt\u0131r. Fiziksel olmayan bir varl\u0131k olarak, akl\u0131n par\u00e7alar\u0131 yoktur; ve belirgin par\u00e7alar\u0131- \u00f6z bilin\u00e7, ak\u0131l ve irade gibi- ayr\u0131lmaz par\u00e7alar\u0131d\u0131r. A\u00e7\u0131klanamaz fiziksel nicelikleri ve sabit de\u011ferleriyle \u015fansa ba\u011fl\u0131 ve t\u00fcrl\u00fc bir evrene (Dawkins\u2019in arg\u00fcman\u0131n\u0131n be\u015finci ad\u0131m\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi) (3) kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k, ilahi bir ak\u0131l \u00e7arp\u0131c\u0131 bi\u00e7imde basittir. Ku\u015fkusuz b\u00f6ylesi bir akl\u0131n karma\u015f\u0131k d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceleri olarak (\u00f6rne\u011fin, infinitesimal calculus d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcyor olabilir) fakat tek ba\u015f\u0131na ak\u0131l olduk\u00e7a basit bir varl\u0131kt\u0131r. \u00d6yle g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcyor ki, Dawkins, ger\u00e7ekten de karma\u015f\u0131k olabilecek olan akl\u0131n <i>d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncelerini<\/i>, inan\u0131lmaz derecede basit olan akl\u0131n <i>kendisiyle<\/i> kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131rmaktad\u0131r. (4) Bu nedenle, evrenin \u00f6tesinde ilahi bir d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncenin varsay\u0131lmas\u0131, kesin olarak basitlik konusunda bir ilerlemeyi temsil etmektedir.<\/p>\n<p>Dawkins\u2019in arg\u00fcman\u0131nda ba\u015fka ad\u0131mlarda da sorun vard\u0131r fakat arg\u00fcman\u0131n\u0131n, evrenin karma\u015f\u0131kl\u0131\u011f\u0131na dayanan tasar\u0131m \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n kuyusunu kazmak bir yana, ateizmi hakl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karacak bir a\u00e7\u0131klama getirmedi\u011fini g\u00f6stermek i\u00e7in yeteri kadar s\u00f6z s\u00f6yledi\u011fimizi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcyorum.<\/p>\n<p>Birka\u00e7 y\u0131l \u00f6nce ateist meslekta\u015f\u0131m Quentin Smith, Stephen Hawkins\u2019in <i>Zaman<\/i><i>\u0131n K\u0131sa Tarihi<\/i> adl\u0131 yap\u0131t\u0131nda Tanr\u0131\u2019ya kar\u015f\u0131 arg\u00fcman\u0131n\u0131 kabaca, \u201cBat\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesinin en k\u00f6t\u00fc ateist arg\u00fcman\u0131\u201d olarak ta\u00e7land\u0131rd\u0131. (5) <i>Tanr\u0131 Yan\u0131lg\u0131s\u0131<\/i>\u2019n\u0131n geli\u015fiyle, Hawking\u2019i tac\u0131n a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan kurtarma ve Richard Dawkins\u2019in tahta \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klama zaman\u0131 geldi.<\/p>\n<p>William Lane Craig<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>Referanslar<\/p>\n<p>1) Dawkins, R., The God Delusion , Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2006, s.5<\/p>\n<p>2) Ibid., s. 157. Nitekim, Tanr\u0131\u2019n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 \u201cy\u0131k\u0131c\u0131\u201d ve \u201ckar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131k\u0131lamaz bir \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fctme\u201d sundu\u011fu i\u00e7in kedisini kutluyor.<\/p>\n<p>3) Evrenin ya\u015fam i\u00e7in ince ayarlar\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lmas\u0131 olarak da bilinir. Kozmik ince ayar i\u00e7in fiziksel bir a\u00e7\u0131klama bulgusuna ili\u015fkin olarak Dawkins\u2019in alt\u0131nc\u0131 ad\u0131m\u0131nda ifade edilen iyimserli\u011fin herhangi bir temeli yoktur ve do\u011fac\u0131n\u0131n inanc\u0131ndan \u00e7ok az daha fazlas\u0131n\u0131 temsil etmektedir.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>4) Asl\u0131nda kafas\u0131n\u0131n kar\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu \u015fikayetinden de anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131yor, \u201cEvrendeki her partik\u00fcl\u00fcn durumunu devaml\u0131 olarak izleyen ve kontrol eden bir Tanr\u0131 basit olamaz\u2026Daha k\u00f6t\u00fcs\u00fc (basitlik a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan bak\u0131lacak olursa) Tanr\u0131\u2019n\u0131n devasa bilincinin di\u011fer k\u00f6\u015feleri ayn\u0131 zamanda her bir insan\u0131n- ve bu ve di\u011fer 100 milyar galakside ya\u015famas\u0131 muhtemel ak\u0131ll\u0131 uzayl\u0131lar\u0131n- yapt\u0131klar\u0131 ve duygular\u0131 ve dualar\u0131yla me\u015fguld\u00fcr (Tanr\u0131 Yan\u0131lg\u0131s\u0131, s.149). Bu, Tanr\u0131\u2019n\u0131n ne oldu\u011fuyla Tanr\u0131\u2019n\u0131n neler hakk\u0131nda d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc \u00f6rt\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcrmektedir. Tanr\u0131\u2019n\u0131n maddi olmayan bir varl\u0131k olarak, s\u0131rad\u0131\u015f\u0131 bir basitli\u011fe sahip oldu\u011funu s\u00f6ylemek Aquinas\u2019\u0131n Tanr\u0131\u2019n\u0131n mant\u0131ksal olarak basit oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yleyen doktrinini destekleme anlam\u0131na gelmez (Dawkins taraf\u0131ndan sayfa 150\u2019de reddediliyor. Dawkins\u2019in s\u00f6z\u00fcn\u00fc etti\u011fi karma\u015f\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa sahip olmadan da Tanr\u0131\u2019n\u0131n \u00e7e\u015fitli \u00f6zellikleri olabilir, \u00f6rne\u011fin, \u201cpar\u00e7alar\u0131n\u0131n heterojen olmas\u0131\u201d gibi (ibid. 150).<\/p>\n<p>5) Smith, Q., \u201cThe Wave Function of a Godless Universe\u201d in Theism, Atheism and Big Bang Cosmology, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993) s.322.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Richard Dawkins Yeni Ateizm diye tan\u0131nan hareketin yaramaz \u00e7ocu\u011fu olarak ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131. \u00c7ok satanlar aras\u0131na giren Tanr\u0131 Yan\u0131lg\u0131s\u0131 adl\u0131 kitab\u0131 bu hareketin ba\u015fyap\u0131t\u0131 haline geldi. Dawkins bu kitapta Tanr\u0131\u2019ya inanc\u0131n bir yan\u0131lg\u0131, yani \u201cyanl\u0131\u015f bir inan\u00e7 ya da izlenim\u201d veya daha k\u00f6t\u00fcs\u00fc, \u201cg\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc kar\u015f\u0131 kan\u0131tlara ra\u011fmen \u0131srarc\u0131 bir yanl\u0131\u015f inan\u00e7\u201d (1) oldu\u011funu g\u00f6stermeyi ama\u00e7l\u0131yor. Dawkins&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1621","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cennet.trinitywebhosting.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1621","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cennet.trinitywebhosting.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cennet.trinitywebhosting.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cennet.trinitywebhosting.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cennet.trinitywebhosting.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1621"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cennet.trinitywebhosting.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1621\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cennet.trinitywebhosting.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1621"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cennet.trinitywebhosting.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1621"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cennet.trinitywebhosting.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1621"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}